Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +283%
1.828 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
192
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GT200
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy