Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +4587%
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2007
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy