NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 460 1024SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1665MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+21%
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 460 1024SP
2.458 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jan 2017
GeForce 16
Generation
Arctic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.458 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Baffin
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
