Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
888 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +13463%
2.984 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS PCI
0.022 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
1
896
Shading Units
8
56
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.268 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.268 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
G98
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
G98-400-U2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net