NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+148%
2.984 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
800
56
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
RV770
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
