NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 430 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+1009%
2.984 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 430 OEM
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Oct 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
2
896
Shading Units
96
56
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
49W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GF108
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
GF108-400-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
