NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 250W)
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
TITAN X Pascal
+31242%
10.97 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Aug 2016
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5X
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
480.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
28
16
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
171.5 GFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.97 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
342.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GP102
-
GPU Variant
GP102-400-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
