AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
12000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+6428%
65.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2023
FireStream
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1155 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
100
800
Shading Units
12800
40
TMUs
400
16
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
AD102
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
AD102
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
