AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD Radeon RX 590
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX 590 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 590
+611%
7.119 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2018
FireStream
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
2304
40
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.44 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.119 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
445.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Polaris 30
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Polaris 30 XT
(215-0922006)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
