AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD FirePro D300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
+117%
2.176 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2014
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
1280
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Pitcairn
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
