AMD FireStream 9250 vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
+104%
2.048 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jul 2022
FireStream
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
Unknown
256 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
