AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA NVS 510
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+226%
1 TFLOPS
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Oct 2012
FireStream
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
192
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GK107
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
