Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5170M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

AMD FirePro W5170M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W5170M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W5170M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1038MHz vs 925MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5170M +48%
1.184 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
3
10
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
37.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
1184 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
74.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tropo
GPU Name
GP108B
Tropo XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
10W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy