Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265 +32%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Feb 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
16
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy