AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI FireGL V7600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 127W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
+271%
1.428 TFLOPS
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Aug 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
127W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Bonaire
GPU Name
R600
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
R600 GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
