Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

AMD FirePro W4000 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV380
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy