Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA T400

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA T400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +69%
1.856 TFLOPS
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
TU117
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy