Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD FirePro W7000

ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD FirePro W7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
FirePro W7000 +31%
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
20
1280
Shading Units
1280
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy