Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega M GH to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (204.8GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega M GH +179%
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Feb 2018
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Vega
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
IGP

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1063 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
1024bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
204.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
24
960
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
76.16 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
228.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Polaris 22
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
VegaM XT (C7398773)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
208 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy