Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon R7 M350

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon R7 M350

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R7 M350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 M350 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1015MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +67%
1.306 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M350
0.779 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1015 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
6
960
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.120 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
779.5 GFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
779.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
48.72 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Meso
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
Meso XT (216-0864018)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy