Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5500M +266%
4.787 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Feb 2020
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
22
960
Shading Units
1408
48
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
149.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.574 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.787 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
299.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Navi 14
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XTM
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
85W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy