Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 PCIe +64%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Sep 2016
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
14
960
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Baffin
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
Baffin E9260 (216-0885288)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy