Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock758MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680M +56%
2.038 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
719 MHz
-
Boost Clock
758 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
-
960
Shading Units
1344
48
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.22 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
84.90 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.038 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
84.90 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
GK104
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
N13E-GTX-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy