AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX110 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX110 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1006MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
+153%
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce MX110
0.515 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Nov 2017
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX(1xx)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
978 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1006 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
256
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.048 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.10 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
515.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
16.10 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Blackcomb
GPU Name
GM108S
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
N16V-GMR1-S-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
5.0
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)
