AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 95W)
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM
+469%
5.834 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
Sep 2016
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
2304
40
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
43W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Heathrow
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
