AMD FirePro M6000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q
+503%
6.18 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
682 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
640
Shading Units
2560
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
43W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Heathrow
GPU Name
GA107
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
