AMD FirePro M3100 vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3100 and 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 136% (1650MHz vs 700MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M3100
0.537 TFLOPS
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
+371%
2.534 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2020
FirePro Mobile
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
650 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
700 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.60 GPixel/s
16.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
79.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.069 TFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.534 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
633.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Mars
GPU Name
DG1
Mars M2 LP
(216-0842009)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
Unknown
77 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.4
