AMD FirePro M3100 vs AMD FirePro W4190M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3100 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (900MHz vs 700MHz)
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M3100
0.537 TFLOPS
FirePro W4190M
+28%
0.691 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
650 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
700 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
16.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
537.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Mars
GPU Name
Opal
Mars M2 LP
(216-0842009)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
