AMD FirePro D500 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (274W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro D500
2.227 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive
+52%
3.405 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2014
Release Date
Nov 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
243.8GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
24
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
1792
96
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
69.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.227 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
556.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
274W
TDP
375W
600 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
Tahiti
Tahiti LE GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
