ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA RTX A4000H
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 140W)
NVIDIA RTX A4000H 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
6064 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
RTX A4000H
+23862%
19.17 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
80
Shading Units
6144
8
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
140W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
GA104
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
GA104-???-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
