Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA NVS 510

ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA NVS 510

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
Lower TDP (17W vs 35W)
NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
NVS 510 +282%
0.306 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2012
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
192
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS

Board Design

17W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cedar
GPU Name
GK107
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net