ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
18096 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+113725%
91.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Dec 2022
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
142
80
Shading Units
18176
8
TMUs
568
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
AD102
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
AD102
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.8
