ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
4400 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
+15687%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Sep 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
80
Shading Units
4480
8
TMUs
280
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
GA100
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.0
Shader Model
N/A
