ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 48GB VRAM RTX 5880 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 285W)
NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2460MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
14040 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
+216368%
69.27 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2024
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2460 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
110
40
Shading Units
14080
4
TMUs
440
4
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
440
-
RT Cores
110
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
433.0 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1082 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
69.27 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
69.27 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1082 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
285W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
AD102
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
AD102
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
