ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 160W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1280GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
296 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
+3168%
1.046 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Sep 2011
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1280MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
7
40
Shading Units
336
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.91 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.62 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1046 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
87.19 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GF114
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
