ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 450W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.01TB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
16344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090
+257962%
82.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Sep 2022
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
1.01TB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
128
40
Shading Units
16384
4
TMUs
512
4
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1290 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
82.58 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
82.58 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1290 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
450W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
AD102
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
AD102-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
