Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000 +48525%
15.56 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
22 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net