ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD FirePro D500
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
FirePro D500
+6859%
2.227 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2014
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
243.8GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
24
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1536
4
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.227 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
556.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
274W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Tahiti LE GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
