ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 550X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 550X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon RX 550X 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1183MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
472 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 550X
+3684%
1.211 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2018
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1183 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.93 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1211 GFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1211 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
75.71 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Lexa
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO
(215-0904018)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
