ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
18176 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Dec 2022
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
142
-
Shading Units
18176
4
TMUs
568
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
Rage 9
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
-
Shader Model
6.8
