ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
18176 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Dec 2022
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
142
-
Shading Units
18176
4
TMUs
568
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
R500
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
