ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Jun 2015
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8
(215-0862040)
R500
Architecture
GCN 3.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.3
