ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon Pro VII
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro VII to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro VII 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
May 2020
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
3840
4
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
408.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.11 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
13.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.528 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
Vega 20
-
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT WS
(215-0914026)
R500
Architecture
GCN 5.1
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
