ATI FireMV 2250 vs ATI FireGL V8650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Aug 2007
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
R600
-
GPU Variant
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
R500
Architecture
TeraScale
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.0
