ATI FireMV 2250 vs Intel Arc A770
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Oct 2022
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
R500
Architecture
Generation 12.7
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
