ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon RX 6700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 10GB VRAM Radeon RX 6700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX 6700 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2450MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Jun 2021
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1941 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2450 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
10GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
156.8 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
352.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.58 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
11.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
705.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
Navi 22
-
GPU Variant
Navi 22 XTL
R500
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
17.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
335 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.5
