ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2696 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 73W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+8233%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Feb 2024
FireGL
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
120
Shading Units
2816
8
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
AD107
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
