Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
16144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (800W vs 2400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +8329%
52.43 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
16384
Shading Units
240
1024
TMUs
80
0
ROPs
32
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
100 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

2400W
TDP
800W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy