Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1600MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
15360 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+1629%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Feb 2017
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
5GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
160bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
16384
Shading Units
1024
1024
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
40
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
408 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS
Board Design
2400W
TDP
75W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
16 nm
100 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
