Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 0System Shared VRAM Quadro FX 470 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
16368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+116411%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 470
0.045 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Sep 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
System Shared
HBM2e
Memory Type
System Shared
8192bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
16384
Shading Units
16
1024
TMUs
8
0
ROPs
4
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.640 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
2400W
TDP
38W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
C79
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
-
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
100 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
